Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Evans's avatar

Then we have the Centre of Buoyancy, to calculate, followed by the dreaded Metacentre and the metacentric height! When I was a ship's officer (UK Merchant Marine) these had to be calculated virtually every day - use of fuel, water stores etc, plus of course everytime something is discharged or loaded! free surface effect of partly filled tanks etc etc etc. All done on paper - no computers to help, draft and trim checked all the time etc etc. The cunning plan was to have a negative metacentric height of around 1 -2 feet, so when the ship rolled, the box shape would dramatically move the centre of buoyancy to give a positive righting moment. On a ship you don't want it to be too stiff! If it is the rolling becomes violent and dangerous! Try motoring a sailing yacht, without its mast up, in rough water and you will discover this effect!

Charlie Stewart's avatar

In my office I have a “reproduction” painting of the sv/Samuel Plimsoll. Give him credit for saving ships from overloading the freight mass and endangering the metacentric height taking into account even the density and temperature of the water. Even then it doesn’t address the placement of the freight which greatly affects the CG and overall stability.

2 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?